HSBC Asset Management Company and L&T Finance Holdings recently entered into an agreement that the former will buy the mutual fund unit of the latter. Going ahead, HSBC intends to merge the operations of L&T Mutual Fund with that of its existing asset management business in India.
Here, we look at what it means to existing investors in both funds.
Option to exit
has 27 actively managed funds—10 in equity, 13 in debt and four in hybrid category—with L&T Triple Ace Bond (corporate), L&T India Value and, L&T Emerging Businesses Fund (small cap) being the top schemes in terms of assets being managed.
HSBC Mutual Fund is comparatively a small fund house with eight schemes each in equity and debt category and two in hybrid. The fund house also has a few fund of funds investing in overseas/domestic markets.
Both the AMCs currently have about 17 schemes in common.
But post Sebi’s scheme categorization rules, mutual funds can have only one open-ended scheme in each category.
Thus, once L&T MF is acquired by HSBC, the overlapping schemes of L&T will be merged with similar schemes in HSBC or vice versa, for which we do not have substantial information at this point of time.
Post that, one scheme from either of the fund houses ceases to exist.
The investors of the scheme that is getting merged will be issued units of the scheme with which the former is merged. Say, if L&T Flexi Fund gets merged with HSBC Flexi cap, investors in the former will be given units of the latter.
But before that, investors will be given a notice of the proposed changes and the option to exit the scheme at the prevailing net asset value (NAV) without paying exit loads, if they do not want to continue with the new scheme.
Note that both the fund houses provide an ELSS (equity-linked savings scheme), or tax-saving scheme that comes with a lock-in of three years. Those with investments within the lock-in period may not have an option to exit but to stay with merged scheme.
How they fared
For assessing the performance, equity and debt funds with only five- and three-year NAV history respectively is considered. And, whenever return is referred to, read it as average of the daily rolled returns for the said period.
As per data from PrimeInvestor, the five-year return of almost all equity funds, except business cycle fund of L&T’s and infrastructure fund of HSBC’s, has been better than their benchmark. However, the performance of both AMCs over peers in the respective category has not been impressive in the five-year period. HSBC’s funds from large, flexi, small and tax-saver schemes’ five-year return lagged against average category returns by 20-180 basis points. Similar funds from L&T MF lagged their category’s returns during the said period by 70-210 basis points.
L&T Value and L&T Midcap funds have only been the outperformers from the lot for the AMC in the equity segment in terms of five-year average rolling return.
However, L&T MF contained downside better than HSBC. We considered minimum return metric from PrimeInvestor, which gives the lowest return generated in the rolling period chosen. This can be indicative of a fund’s ability to contain downsides or losses.
For example, the minimum five-year rolling return in the past five years for the infrastructure fund of L&T has been -1.5%. But, it is -12.7% for HSBC’s fund in the same category.
Even in the debt category, L&T Mutual Fund scored better with higher returns compared to the category average in the three-year period.
What should investors do now?
Experts believe that investors in both the fund houses can wait to see how HSBC decides to manage each fund after the merger.
The acquisition transaction should not automatically trigger an investor to do something, said Vishal Dhawan, CEO & founder, Plan Ahead Wealth Advisors.
“Different approaches can be taken on how these funds will get managed in future. It is too early for the decision to be made at this point of time. The right time would be after six months from completion of the integration process," Dhawan added.
Not just the existing investments, even the ongoing investments such as SIPs or STPs too in to these funds require no change in strategy based on the announcement of merger, according to Dhawan.
Addressing L&T MF investors’ worries on how their investments will fare after the acquisition by HSBC MF, Dhirendra Kumar, CEO, Value Research, said, “L&T MF is the larger fund house and I expect that its fund managers will be retained by and large. So, I don’t think there is much to fear from a fund manager exit point of view."
The cloud of uncertainty that has hanging over the sale of L&T MF for the past few years has also finally gone and this is again, a net positive for its MF investors," Kumar concluded.
satya.sontanam@livemint.com
Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Satya Sontanam
Satya Sontanam is a senior content creator at Mint with a keen interest on data crunching, analysis and the story behind trends. She writes on personal finance including investments, regulations and data stories. Before joining Mint in December 2021, Satya worked as research analyst and also a personal finance writer at The Hindu BusinessLine. Satya is a qualified chartered accountant. In her free time, she enjoys doing yoga and listening to podcasts.
Read more from this author
Related Premium Stories
Why senior citizens require deductibles in health plans
Decoding the rationale of equal weight investing
GIFT City’s lenders are now banking on FDs to lure NRIs
Groww halts investing in US stocks, asks users to withdraw or migrate by 30 June
Are ultra premium credit cards worth their hefty annual fees?
‘Life insurance companies should be permitted to sell health plans’
‘Life insurance companies should be permitted to sell health plans’
Rich foreigners will now get tax-free access to Indian MFs
‘India has robust financials, is on every investor’s radar’: Kenneth Andrade
Why many NRIs are missing out on India’s market rally
Explore Premium
Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Check all the latest action on Budget 2024 here. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
MoreLess
Published: 27 Dec 2021, 12:51 AM IST
As a financial expert with extensive knowledge in the mutual fund industry, I'll provide a comprehensive analysis of the article regarding the recent agreement between HSBC Asset Management Company and L&T Finance Holdings. The focus is on the implications for existing investors in both funds.
Firstly, let's delve into the background of the deal. HSBC Asset Management Company is set to acquire the mutual fund unit of L&T Finance Holdings, with plans to merge the operations of L&T Mutual Fund with its existing asset management business in India. The article highlights the number of actively managed funds on both sides, with L&T having 27 funds and HSBC having a comparatively smaller portfolio. The merger is anticipated to lead to the consolidation of overlapping schemes, as per Sebi’s scheme categorization rules, allowing mutual funds to have only one open-ended scheme in each category.
Now, turning our attention to the potential impact on existing investors, it's crucial to understand the process of merging schemes. The article explains that overlapping schemes will be merged with similar schemes from the other fund house, leading to the cessation of one scheme. Investors of the merged scheme will receive units of the scheme with which it is merged. The article emphasizes that investors will be given a notice of the proposed changes and the option to exit the scheme at the prevailing net asset value (NAV) without incurring exit loads if they choose not to continue with the new scheme.
The article also mentions that both HSBC and L&T offer Equity-Linked Savings Schemes (ELSS), or tax-saving schemes, which come with a lock-in period of three years. Investors within the lock-in period may not have the option to exit but will be required to stay with the merged scheme.
To evaluate the performance of the funds, the article considers the five- and three-year NAV history for equity and debt funds, respectively. The analysis suggests that while the five-year returns of most equity funds have been better than their benchmarks, both HSBC and L&T have not outperformed peers in their respective categories consistently. L&T Mutual Fund is noted for better downside protection in comparison to HSBC.
As for the future actions for investors, experts recommend waiting to see how HSBC manages each fund after the merger. It is emphasized that the acquisition should not automatically trigger investors to make decisions, and different approaches can be taken on how the funds will be managed. The article suggests that the right time for decisions would be after six months from the completion of the integration process.
In conclusion, the article provides insights into the implications of the HSBC-L&T Mutual Fund deal on existing investors, including the potential consolidation of schemes, the process of merging, and recommendations from experts on investor actions post-acquisition.